Tuesday, June 19, 2012

Final Exam

1.)Could not find this article in any deep web source. Not proquest, or eric or ebscohost or any of the others available on the Clark college libraries website, so I worked around. I researched the Feliciter itself and discovered it was a Canadian Librarians Professional Journal.  I then went to Vol 57, Issue 5 page 182, and started reading.  


 2.) Used Google to find Morrison, E. (2011, August 22). Are books dead, and can authors survive? The Guardian.  Found it at the Guardian website straight away.  Literally, all it took was to copy and past the citation into Google's website. Too easy, Drill Sargent. lol 






3a.) Evaluate the level of trustworthiness. Hmmm.  This is an article in a professional Journal for Librarians. Are you aware that Librarians are the secret rulers of the world?? Never and I mean NEVER upset a Librarian, for they hold the keys to all the information in the world!!     Ok with that being said, this is an article discussing the trend and movement towards e-books as opposed to traditional paper books.  The author is a published author of two additional books in his own right, as well as articles in this and other like minded journals. Its dating is 2011, so it is more relevant in terms of timeline.  It seems more of an Op-Ed piece, so really you must gauge the level of trust you wish to put in the author and his background to determine his level of expertise.  The publication its self does indeed weigh in with some level of trust. See earlier comment on upsetting librarians.   








3b.)Morrison's article passes some points of ASPECT verification.  The Guardian is a reputable publisher.  The footnotes and sources for his points are credible, i.e. Barns and Nobles, the NY Times. However, his information for some points is out of date, as well as this article is out of date: Article written in 2011 using source material from 2010 and 2009. This detracts from the usefulness in my opinion.








4.) Are books dead, and can authors survive? This is the question Ewan Morrison poses in his article. While it helps to remember that the vast majority of writers, contributors and readers of the Guardian are more "left of center," (upping the odds of a biased slant) the information he puts out from his sources is real and viable. Morrison talks about the decline of paper media sales, with the popular trends swinging more to the digital media sources.  Newspaper sales are down, bound books sales are down, and the only real increase in paper media sales is in the realm of textbooks! (For some reason, students seem to prefer the actual book in hand rather than the digital textbook opportunities. Can you say "resale?")
     Morrison goes on to predict the complete eradication of paper books in the next twenty-five years. admittedly, he reminds us that predictions such as this have happened in the past by sarcastically stating that it was believed the printing press would overthrow Catholicism in the fourteen hundreds and that video would kill the cinema.  Obviously, this was not the case.
     With sales down, publishing houses are shying away from the big advances, or staying with already established, producing authors rather than taking the chances on budding, emerging new talent.  What this foretells for the future is uncertain, but as these prolific authors start to fall off, or for whatever reason no longer churn out bestsellers left and right, new and exciting stories will fade away.  This by its self is disastrous. 
     There is another area where books are still attractive in the printed format: children's books.  Studies show that with a strong childhood grounding in hand held books, pages a child can turn, students are more successful in their scholastic endevours. If nothing else, I believe this will ensure the continuation of the printed word for generations to come.....
     














Monday, June 18, 2012

Research Journal Part 10: Create a Web Page

http://letteraday.org/students/wmcelroy.html

OK a paragraph where I summarize this experience.  Well lets see.  It took all weekend to get my soon to be ex-wife to let me use the computer so I could at least attempt to do this assignment.  Since she knows my homework was due Sunday she wouldn't let me do this until Monday.  Did I mention where she threatened to call the police and tell them I stole "her" car if I left and tried to go to the library and do this assignment? Since the car is in her name, since the bank wont let us put my name on the title until the loan is paid off, and I didn't relish spending time in the local lockup, I get to do this late. So lets recap the whole term.  My grandmother passes away at the end of April.  I have to arrange to take care of Grandpa, an Alzheimer's patient, because Grandma was his care giver.  I have to damn near browbeat my Father,  their son, to come out here and take care of his parents so I can go to work and school. Once all that gets straightened out, my wife leaves me for her unemployed cable installer "friend," and now I'm working not two but three jobs (one full time and two part time) to try to keep afloat.   As far as the webpage was concerned, it was simple cut and paste, reminiscent of the days of MySpace, and about as interesting as it was back then.
Some parts of this class were fun and informative, some where refreshers, and some I really disliked.

All in all, it was an experience......

Research Journal Part 9: Evaluating Information


1. Google
     a) utilized AND to connect Internet and censorship with the limiter .gov
     b)United States.Department of State. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton Address on Internet          Freedom. Office of the Spokesman,21 Jan 2010. Web. 18 Jun 2012.
     c) This is relevant and real, based on the authority of the US Gov,the purpose of getting the info out and the fact that,while it is her words and views, it has the correct information, because the last thing a career pol wants it to be wrong in public.

2. Google
     a) Used internet (government AND censorship) with the limiter .edu
     b) "Survey of Government Internet Filtering Practices Indicates Increasing Internet Censorship."Berkman Center for Internet and Society.Harvard University, 18 May 2007. Web !8 Jun 2012
     c) This is relevant and real, based on the assumed authority of the reputation of Harvard School of Law at Harvard University. Deals with research concerning the increased censership of the internet in 41 diferent countries.  It is furthers validated with the backing of four leading global universities: Cambridge, Oxford, Harvard, and Toronto 

3. Google.
     a) Used Internet (international And Censorship) with the limiter . org
     b)Edwards, Scott. "Google, the Benevolent Behemoth?"Human Rights Now Blog.Amnesty International, 18 Jun 2012. Web. 18 Jun 2012
     c) This is a good update on how Google is tracking internet censorship internationally.  Its authority is the backing of the Global Giant in world advocacy, Amnesty International. Of course, it will be slanted, they have an agenda, but that in its self help validate the site as well as the blog.

4. Goggle (I'm having tons of luck with Google....)
     a). Internet (censorship AND government AND international) with the limiter .com
     b) Wines, Michael. "Google to Alert Users to Chinese Censorship."The New York Times. The New York Times Company, 6.1 (2012) n. pag. Web. 18 Jun 2012
     c) In this article it actually talks about how Google is getting around Chinese censorship with an alert telling users in mainland china if their search words will cause governmental censorship to disconnect the user arbitrarily from Google's website, thus allowing "work arounds" to the stringent censorship laws of mainland China. I'm sorry, :-) this article just tickles the little man inside me that loves to thumb his nose at "the man"



Honestly I think all four of the top level domains have relevancy when searching mu topic. It is up to me as the researcher to sift through and kind the kernels of needed info while doing so.....